Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-09-12 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 444.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, getting a general score of 97.6 against 75.3. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy Fold design is way newer and just a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3's, although it is incredibly heavier.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy Fold features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Fold has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same video resolution and a camera with a 12 megapixels resolution, the Galaxy Fold also has higher video frame rates and a larger camera aperture.
Galaxy Fold has improved battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Fold costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.