Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-09-12 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| $ 444.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, getting a score of 89.7 against 75.3. Galaxy S10 Lite's body is noticeably newer, but somewhat heavier and a little thicker than Xiaomi Mi Note 3. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixel density. Galaxy S10 Lite takes a lot better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.