Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-09-12 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, getting an 86.3 score against 75.3. The Samsung Galaxy S10e design is newer and a bit lighter than Xiaomi Mi Note 3's, but it's also just a little thicker. The Galaxy S10e counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Mi Note 3. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy S10e, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a just a bit lower display density. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy S10e also has higher 60 fps video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in low-light situations.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S10e is also a bit cheaper, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.