Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, getting a 93.4 score against 75.3. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 has the older 13 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo. Galaxy S22 is a just a little heavier device than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, but they are 0.3inches thick.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a just a bit better display density, way more screen brightness, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little larger screen. The Galaxy S22 counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S22 has a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a back camera with much more mega pixels and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality. Galaxy S22's storage for apps and games is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi Note 3 one, both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S22 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S22 costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.