Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-12 | -- |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, having an 82.6 score against 75.3. Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 has 14 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Galaxy S25 design is way lighter and way thinner than Xiaomi Mi Note 3.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 features a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy S25 features a better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a lot brighter display, a little higher display density, a bit larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Samsung Galaxy S25's storage capacity for games and applications is very similar to Xiaomi Mi Note 3's one, they have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S25 has just a little bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Galaxy S25 counts with a lot better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a way higher video resolution and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Mi Note 3. If you want to save some money, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.