Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-12 | -- |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3's global score of 75.3. These phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra body is incredibly lighter and much thinner than Xiaomi Mi Note 3.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a bigger screen, a just a bit higher pixel density and way more screen brightness. Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a way higher video quality, a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.