Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-09-12 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| $ 444.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 401 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3's general score of 75.3. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is notably newer, but noticeably thicker and heavier than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an older 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixel amount in each inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has greater battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking images in low light situations, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Xiaomi Mi Note 3 also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Mi Note 3. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.