Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, having an 81 score against 75.3. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's body is a lot newer, but incredibly thicker and incredibly heavier than Xiaomi Mi Note 3.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a processor that is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi Note 3 one, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a bit worse pixels amount in each display inch, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a little smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro takes a little bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and a much higher 25 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features greater battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.