Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| $ 444.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3's 75.3 overall score. Although the Galaxy Z Flip is heavier than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, it's a little thinner and also noticeably newer. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little smaller display, a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the same video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Mi Note 3. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.