Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| $ 444.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, getting a 92.3 score against 75.3. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is incredibly newer and a little thinner, but heavier than Xiaomi Mi Note 3.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a bit smaller display. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with much more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 features a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 6% bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same video definition, the same resolution camera and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs more than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.