Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 444.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, with a overall score of 94.6 against 75.3. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a extremely newer and a little thinner phone than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, although it's heavier. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has better video frame rates. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Mi Note 3. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.