Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is way better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, having a 90.6 score against 75.3. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is extremely newer and thinner, but incredibly heavier than Xiaomi Mi Note 3.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way smaller display and a much lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a little greater display pixel density.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Xiaomi Mi Note 3 also has a larger aperture to capture better images in low light situations. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has more internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 26% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.