Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | ZTE |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2020-03-30 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 11 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, getting a global score of 76 against 75.3. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the ZTE Axon 11 has an older 10 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo. The ZTE Axon 11 design is extremely newer than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3's, although it is just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a little more vivid display than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater count of pixels in each inch of screen. ZTE Axon 11 has a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 3. They have 8 cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The ZTE Axon 11 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the ZTE Axon 11 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
ZTE Axon 11 counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the ZTE Axon 11 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB. The ZTE Axon 11 counts with a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 14% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.