| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-01-15 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.11 x 3.06 x 0.27 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.19 ounces |
| White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Google Pixel 3a has a general score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro's 75.3 overall score. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a has 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has Android 5.0 version, so it provides some additional features. The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro also has a 64-bits processor and a graphics processor.
Xiaomi Mi Note Pro features a much better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a quite higher pixels density, a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little larger display. Google Pixel 3a and Xiaomi Mi Note Pro have quite similar memory capacity to install applications and games, both have equal internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, although it has a lesser mega pixels camera. The Google Pixel 3a's battery performance is just as good as the battery lifetime in Xiaomi Mi Note Pro.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 3a is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.