Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-01-15 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.11 x 3.06 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.89 ounces |
| White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a score of 78.9, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro's 75.3 general score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a XL has 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has Android 5.0 version. The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has a much better display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Note Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro also has an extra graphics processor and a 64-bit CPU. The Google Pixel 3a XL takes much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, although it has a lesser MP resolution back camera.
Google Pixel 3a XL's storage capacity to store more games and applications is very similar to the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro one, both have equal internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 3a XL features greater battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3a XL is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.