Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-15 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.11 x 3.06 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, having a global score of 83.8 against 75.3. The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM, the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro also has a 64-bit processing unit and an additional graphics processor.
Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a greater pixels density. Galaxy A50 has a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has a back-facing camera with much more MP.
The Galaxy A50 has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A50 counts with better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has a 33% more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.