Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-01-15 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.11 x 3.06 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is better than the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro's 75.3 global score. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has a newer 10 version while Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has Android 5.0 version. Xiaomi Mi Note Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processor.
The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has a brighter screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a lot better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A50s has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with improved battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.