Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-15 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.11 x 3.06 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.07 ounces |
| White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, getting a general score of 85.5 against 75.3. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Galaxy A51 has a more recent 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has Android 5.0, so it gives some additional features. Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro also has an extra graphics processing unit and a 64 bits CPU. Galaxy A51 has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has a much better resolution camera in the back. Galaxy A51 has superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy A51 costs a little more money than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.