Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-01-15 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.11 x 3.06 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.74 ounces |
| White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro's overall score of 75.3. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has Android 5.0 version, providing you some extra features. Galaxy Fold is a notably heavier cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, but both are equally thin.
The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro counts with a way better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly better 2560 x 1440 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Fold has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Fold, because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bits processor. The Galaxy Fold features a much longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Fold shoots much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, although it has a lesser MP resolution back-facing camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Mi Note Pro. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.