Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-15 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.11 x 3.06 x 0.27 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro's 75.3 score. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has Android 5.0 version. The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has just a little better performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64-bits processor.
Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has a much better display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes way better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has a back facing camera with way more megapixels. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Mi Note Pro. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.