Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-15 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.11 x 3.06 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.78 ounces |
| White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is way better than the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, with a 94.8 score against 75.3. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version while Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has Android 5.0, so it provides some extra features and increased performance. The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S20, although it has a quite smaller display, a bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a just a bit worse pixels density.
The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy S20, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and an extra graphics co-processor. The Galaxy S20 has a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a much better memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S20 has longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Mi Note Pro. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.