Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-15 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.11 x 3.06 x 0.27 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.83 ounces |
| White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, having a 98 score against 75.3. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version and Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has Android 5.0. The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has a brighter screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher screen density.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Note Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro also counts with a 64 bits processor and an additional graphics co-processor.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has a way higher resolution camera. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has a 67 percent more battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.