Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2015-01-15 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.11 x 3.06 x 0.27 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 8.08 ounces |
| White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is way better than the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro's 75.3 global score. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has Android 5.0, so it counts with some extra features and enhanced performance.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because although it has a little worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3088. The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64-bits processing unit.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes a lot better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has a camera with lot more megapixels. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with much more memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has a 67% more battery size.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Mi Note Pro. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S22 Ultra, otherwise you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.