Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-01-15 | -- |
| 6.11 x 3.06 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| White | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro's global score of 75.3. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has Android 5.0 version, providing a couple additional features and improved performance.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because although it has a little bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has a way better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processor.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures way better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has a back-facing camera with a way higher 200 mega-pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.