Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-15 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.11 x 3.06 x 0.27 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro's global score of 75.3. The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro also has a 64-bit CPU and an additional graphics co-processor.
The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S9, although it has a little worse 2560 x 1440 resolution, a quite smaller screen and a little inferior pixels number per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a lot better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, although it has a worse resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S9 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S9's battery duration is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro one.
Galaxy S9 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.