Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-15 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.11 x 3.06 x 0.27 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, having a global score of 92.3 against 75.3. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has Android 5.0, so it gives you some nice extra features. Xiaomi Mi Note Pro counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an extra graphics co-processor.
Xiaomi Mi Note Pro counts with a sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes way better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, although it has a lower resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.