Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-07-19 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.59 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2912 x 1224 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 458 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4780mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mix Flip is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a, with a score of 83.2 against 78.8. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mix Flip has a more recent 14 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11. Even though Xiaomi Mix Flip is heavier than the Google Pixel 3a, it's just a little bit thinner and also notably newer.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi Mix Flip, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mix Flip counts with a much sharper display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a bigger display, a little more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1224 x 2912 pixels.
Xiaomi Mix Flip takes a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a way higher resolution back camera. The Xiaomi Mix Flip counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mix Flip has a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4780mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.