Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-07-19 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.59 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2912 x 1224 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 458 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4780mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mix Flip is a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active, with a score of 83.2 against 75.8. Even though Xiaomi Mix Flip is a little heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active, it's incredibly thinner and extremely newer. Galaxy S7 Active has a very superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Mix Flip, although it has 4 less CPU cores and less RAM.
Xiaomi Mix Flip has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1224 x 2912 pixels and a little inferior pixels quantity per screen inch, it also counts with a lot brighter screen and a much bigger display. The Xiaomi Mix Flip has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mix Flip captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Xiaomi Mix Flip also has a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot better video quality. The Xiaomi Mix Flip has better battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4780mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.