Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-13 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Note 7 Pro has a score of 80.5, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 global score. The Xiaomi Note 7 Pro is a a lot heavier device than the Google Pixel 3a, but both of them are equally thin. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Note 7 Pro has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11, so it provides the user some extra features and enhanced performance.
Xiaomi Note 7 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 3a features a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixels amount per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Note 7 Pro features a better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Xiaomi Note 7 Pro has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Note 7 Pro features improved battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.