Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-13 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro's overall score of 80.5. Although Samsung Galaxy Fold and Xiaomi Note 7 Pro were only released with a few months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is thinner but much heavier than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 9.0 Pie OS, so both of them should offer all the same OS features.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. Xiaomi Note 7 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel count in each inch in the display.
The Galaxy Fold has a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because it has more internal memory. Xiaomi Note 7 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.