Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-13 | -- |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.56 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is better than the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro's 80.5 general score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has older 14 version while Xiaomi Note 7 Pro has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is incredibly thinner and noticeably lighter than the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better screen than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because it has a quite larger screen, a just a bit more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because it has more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Note 7 Pro features a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has superior battery performance than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because it has a much higher video definition, a lot higher 200 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a larger camera aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.