Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-13 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Note 7 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with an 80.5 score against 75.8. Xiaomi Note 7 Pro's body is a lot newer and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, but it is also just a bit heavier. The Xiaomi Note 7 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of cores (but slower) and 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S7 Active has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Xiaomi Note 7 Pro has a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's battery duration is very similar to the battery performance in Xiaomi Note 7 Pro. The Xiaomi Note 7 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro also counts with a back camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.