Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-03-13 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Note 7 Pro is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a score of 80.5 against 80.1. Xiaomi Note 7 Pro is an older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it is way lighter and notably thinner anyway. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Note 7 Pro has 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo, so it provides the user a couple additional features.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Note 7 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera, a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.