Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-12 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, with an 88.1 score against 87.9. Apple iPhone X is an noticeably older phone than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, but it is thinner and lighter anyway. The iPhone X counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and much less brightness, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little higher pixel density.
IPhone X features a much better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Apple iPhone X has a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has lesser and slower processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 2716mAh. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a very superior camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video, it also counts with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a way larger sensor shooting much better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.