Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-12 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is slightly better than the Google Pixel, with a score of 87.9 against 80.2. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's body is incredibly newer, but a bit thicker and extremely heavier than Google Pixel. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little bit better performance than Google Pixel, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a way larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better camera than Google Pixel, because it has a lot bigger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures, a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos, a lot higher video quality and a back camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Google Pixel's memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro one, both have exactly the same internal memory. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 70 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.