Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-12 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than the Google Pixel 3a, having an 87.9 score against 78.8. Even though the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is newer than the Google Pixel 3a, it is a little thicker and noticeably heavier. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the older 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a larger screen. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing images in low light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 57% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.