Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-12 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is much better than Google Pixel 3a XL's overall score of 78.9. Both devices we compare here include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the older 10 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro body is newer, but just a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier than Google Pixel 3a XL.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features improved battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light captures, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor, a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.