Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-12 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4, having a global score of 87.9 against 81.9. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison, it must be noted that it's also a a bit thicker and notably heavier cellphone. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger screen.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features much more memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a processor that's very similar to the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro one, both have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 68% more battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing images or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot higher video definition, a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera and a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.