Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-12 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 score. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro body is somewhat heavier and just a little thicker than Google Pixel 4 XL. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a processing unit that is very similar to the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro one, both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel amount in each inch of screen and a better 1440 x 3040 resolution. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much larger back camera sensor and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.