Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a's general score of 82.9. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is an extremely heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than the Google Pixel 4a.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little bit lower pixel quantity per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger display.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way bigger sensor, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
Google Pixel 4a and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro both count with really similar storage to store more games and applications, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.