Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than the Honor 50 Pro, getting an 87.9 score against 77. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is an older, somewhat heavier and thicker phone than the Honor 50 Pro. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version and Honor 50 Pro has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Honor 50 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit sharper display than Honor 50 Pro, although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit less pixels per inch in the display, they both have a display of the same size.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features better battery performance than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.