Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 393 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, having a 92.1 score against 87.9. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a just a little heavier device than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, but both of them are 0.35inches thick. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has newer 14 version and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a little larger screen, a quite better resolution of 1280 x 2800, a just a bit more pixels per inch of display and much more brightness. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with longer battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit better camera than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, because although it has a much smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting images and video in low-light situations and a smaller sensor, it also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution and a much higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.