Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-12 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than the HTC U Ultra, having a overall score of 87.9 against 77. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro design is notably newer than HTC U Ultra's, although it is notably heavier and somewhat thicker. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little bit better display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a larger display. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality, a way better video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera.
HTC U Ultra counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 57 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.