Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than the LG K52, with an 87.9 score against 76. Despite being the best in this review, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a heavier and just a bit thicker device than LG K52. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 operating system. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a more vivid display than LG K52, because it has a quite larger display, a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
The LG K52 has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features just a little better processing power than LG K52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a lot better camera than LG K52, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a much more MP camera in the back, a bigger camera sensor taking better quality photographs and videos and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with better battery duration than LG K52, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.