Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Titanium and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than LG K61, getting an 87.9 score against 77.6. Even being the best in our current comparison, we must highlight that it is also a somewhat heavier and just a little thicker cellphone. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version and LG K61 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than LG K61, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little sharper display than LG K61, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels count in each inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than LG K61, because it has a way better video resolution and a way higher resolution back-facing camera. The LG K61 features a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG K61 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with better battery duration than LG K61, because it has an 18% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.