Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than LG K62, having an 87.9 score against 78.2. Although it's the best phone in this comparison review, Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's design is somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than the LG K62. Both devices in our current comparison use the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding operating system features.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than LG K62, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a brighter screen than LG K62, because it has a quite larger display, a greater pixels density and a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
LG K62 features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG K62 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has longer battery life than LG K62, because it has an 18 percent more battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots a lot better photographs and videos than LG K62, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way better video resolution, a lot more MP camera and a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.