Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-12 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a global score of 87.9, which is just a bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ's global score of 82.5. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's design is newer, but incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker than LG V30S ThinQ. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better processing unit than LG V30S ThinQ. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores. LG V30S ThinQ has a display that's very similar to Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's display, because although the LG V30S ThinQ has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a greater camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video, it also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.