Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-12 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 global score. Even though Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is newer than LG V35 ThinQ, it is thicker and much heavier. LG V35 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater amount of pixels per screen inch.
LG V35 ThinQ features a processing unit that is very similar to the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro one, both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a very superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, it also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.