Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.98 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is just a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ, having an 87.9 score against 81.2. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's design is newer than the LG V40 ThinQ's, but it's heavier and somewhat thicker. These devices come with the same Android 10 OS. The LG V40 ThinQ features a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a higher display pixels density.
LG V40 ThinQ's CPU is just as good as the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro one, they have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 42% greater battery size. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a greater camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a back camera with much more megapixels and a way larger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.