Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.9 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-12 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.98 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a little bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ, with an 87.9 score against 87.6. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version while LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a a little bit heavier phone than LG V60 ThinQ, but they are 0.35inches thick.
LG V60 ThinQ features a CPU that's just as good as the processor in Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although the LG V60 ThinQ has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little more vivid screen than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a bit smaller screen, a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little worse pixel number per inch of display.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots way better videos and photos than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light images, they both have the same video frame rate, the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the same camera sensor size and a back camera with a 64 mega pixels.
LG V60 ThinQ has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ has just a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.